LJ over at A Journey East started
a movie club, and Charlie Countryman was
June’s film pick (Watch her YouTube review here). I’ve been wanting to watch that one, so I thought I’d give it
a go, too.
Charlie Countryman stars Shia LaBeouf, Evan Rachel Wood, and
Mads Mikkelsen. Rupert Grint also makes a side appearance. The film, directed
by Fredrik Bond, follows Charlie after the death of his mother whose spirit
tells him to go to Bucharest. On the plane there, he connects with a man
sitting next to him who dies before landing. His spirit tells Charlie to
deliver a message to his daughter. From there, Charlie is set on a journey of
finding himself and love and what he’s willing to go through for those things.
This one checked a lot of boxes for me as I am a sucker for
indie-films and an even bigger sucker for character studies.
Visually, there was a concentration on close ups and what
was happening in the characters faces, which the actors delivered; Shia LaBeouf
really shines in this role, I think. His and Wood’s emotions were all right
there, playing on the surface. I also like the homage to Romania. When the camera did pan
out, it definitely showed off the gritty beauty of the area. I also loved some
of the subtleties. Charlie does a lot of running, and there was one part where
he looks over as he’s running to see graffiti of a running stick figure next to
him and he kind of gives it a nod; a great visual touch.
Plot wise, I can say I wasn’t completely on board with the
intensity of the love story. The amount of time they knew each other didn’t
really justify the lengths he went to for me (vague, but I don’t want to spoil
anything as I still feel it is worth the watch). I did like the action/Nigel
plot line. I think it would’ve been equally interesting, if not maybe more, to
have the film center on Wood’s character instead of LaBeouf’s. Mikkelsen is
terrifying as he is in most his roles, and that plot line would’ve showcased
him more (Does anyone else feel like there’s something creepy about Mikkelsen
in general? He’s probably the nicest guy in real life, but something about him
would scare me if I ran into him in any dark setting.).
Although, I wouldn’t discount Charlie’s role, either. I’m
about to layout some SPOILERS here, so if you don’t want to know, skip to the
bottom.
**SPOILERS**
I liked the imagery the ending represented, at least my
interpretation of it. I felt like he went to Romania as a lost guy who was
searching for a way to fill the hole his mother’s death left behind. He’s
broken and confused and he meets this girl who’s kind of equally messed up, if
not more. And, by the end, through loving this girl and also discovering his
own bravery through her, he risks his life for her and his belief in them, popping
up out of the water all clean and happy and renewed. Anyone else feeling a
baptismal vibe there? If you think about it, he was literally shattered and
bleeding as he went in, and he emerged blood free and smiling.
**END OF SPOILERS**
All and all, I give it a 7 out of 10. Even if I wasn’t fully
on board with the love story, I think the visual beauty is worth a watch, the
acting is great, there are some heartbreaking moments as well as some funny
ones—thank you Rupert Grint and James Buckley—but I didn’t feel like I got
enough of all the characters to really flesh it all out and make me care about them
and understand the depth of the situation.
Loved the last scene too! Thought it was so beautiful and definitely symbolic. I like your analysis of it a lot, I think it sums it up perfectly. I really liked how there were both dramatic and funny moments as well, gave it nice balance. Glad you liked the visuals too, I was really impressed with them! Loved reading your review, you definitely touched on some points I didn't even pick up on.
ReplyDelete